What are your thoughts on a future where code is represented as a structured model, rather than text? Do you think that AI-powered coding assistants benefit from that?

It’s important to realize that “modern “AI” doesn’t understand human level meanings any better today (in many cases: worse!). So it is not going to be able to serve as much of a helper in a general coding assistant.

These structures are made precisely to allow programs to “reason” about some parts of lower level meaning, and in many cases to rearrange the structure to preserve meaning but to make the eventual code that is generated more efficient.

Most coding assistants — with or without “modern “AI” — also do reasoning and manipulation of structures.

My waist finally looks like how it did before I had kids but I didn’t lose weight. Why am I still 15 lbs from my starting weight?

in structures, such as:

NOT DATA … BUT MEANING!

i.e. “operator like things” at the nodes …

Suns reportedly trade Kevin Durant to Houston Rockets for Jalen Green, Dillon Brooks, draft picks - Yahoo Sports

Another canonical form could be Lisp S-expressions, etc.

Long ago in the 50s this was even thought of as a kind of “AI” and this association persisted into the 60s. Several Turing Awards were given for progress on this kind of “machine reasoning”.

+ for

Fred Espenak, astronomy's 'Mr. Eclipse', dies at 71 - Space

/ \ and ⁄ / | \

First, it’s worth noting that the “syntax recognition” phase of most compilers already does build a “structured model”, often in what used to be called a “canonical form” (an example of this might be a “pseudo-function tree” where every elementary process description is put into the same form — so both “a + b” and “for i := 1 to x do […]” are rendered as

A slogan that might help you get past the current fads is:

Two More Persona 4 Actors Have Said They're Not Returning for an Unannounced Persona 4 Remake - IGN

a b i 1 x []

plus(a, b) for(i, 1, x, […])